Blizzard Entertainment president J. Allen Brack – not to be confused with – Adrian – from irc.freenode.net – among-st others; talks about a serious subject. Have they seriously overstepped their boundary – and banned another player? not likely.
Of course they are talking about millions of dollars – millions of those kinds of dollars – and the Chineese are not invited. What do I do? – Pay my attention to how many times they tell a lie – They are lying! – Oh boy. The Chinese never lied about a Dragon – or how to set up the game – so, such is the narrative once more – hang em’ high; even yet – six inches from the ceiling:
“I want to be clear: our relationships in China had no influence on our decision. We have these rules to keep the focus on the game and on the tournament to the benefit of a global audience, and that was the only consideration in the actions we took. If this had been the opposing viewpoint delivered in the same divisive and deliberate way, we would have felt and acted the same.”
So, in my honest opinion: The Chinese have been influential in the United States. – I haven’t told authorities however – that it is more like building a layer cake with my cake pans – but that is something for another day:
“One of our goals at Blizzard is to make sure that every player, everywhere in the world, regardless of political views, religious beliefs, race, gender, or any other consideration always feels safe and welcome both competing in and playing our games.”
Now that is laughable – open for debate – and extremely contentious. Never the less – the narrative has simply been that the Chinese player would continue about his usual – and blizzard entertainment soars over-head – an icon for all humanity.
Is authoring what they are doing have any humanity at all? – no.
Kotaku reported today on multiple protest groups planning actions – is this an art? We simply don’t know. I do know how many millions of dollars are involved – no no. just let it run – and nobody knows – how terrible sitting that close to the television is. –
“There is a consequence for taking the conversation away from the purpose of the event and disrupting or derailing the broadcast,” Brack said –
Which is also completely perverted and incidentally : contradictory to the only consideration and divisive and deliberate way, Under there is something even more terrible – how do you keep up with all of this – its not easy – get a broom and sweep at your job. Demented still. lol